Letter to the Editor: Students continue to be short changed
December 9, 2015
Back in October, I wrote a letter to the Wayne Stater concerning the dismissal of Dr. Walker. I was fairly convinced at the time that this would all be seen as a gross mistake and would be resolved quickly.
Instead, it seems that psychology majors under Dr. Walker’s direction have continued to be shortchanged. They lost their mentor, their project director and the person they were most comfortable with in their area of study.
Bad form for a school that prides itself in its concern for students. I used to advise incoming freshmen. I emphasized the care this college gave them. I’m no longer sure that is the case.
I have read, with interest, Wayne Stater coverage and social media posts about this ongoing situation. From an outside perspective it continues to look like a few administrators and faculty with personal grudges have allowed themselves to turn departmental squabbling into a campus wide embarrassment.
I’m not a naive observer of faculty disputes. I’ve seen many outright nasty encounters between personalities at Wayne over the years and have never seen the college allow itself to be railroaded into this sort of a standoff. A level headed administrator or faculty member was always able to fend off a crisis. It seems that there is departmental and divisional dysfunction in this case without a capable leader to take control.
It’s hard to imagine that this has come to lawyers fighting over open or closed meetings. It looks an awful lot like administrators trying to cover their backs. If allegations have been made and reasons given for the firing, those making the allegations should be able to stand up in public and make them. In a public institution that at least claims to believe in shared governance, a public hearing of grievances should be the standard.
I also think that the general faculty should be watching this carefully. Once the “process plays out” they should be aware of all that happened and how it happened. Yet another argument for open meetings.
They should feel less secure in their tenured status and more concerned about the whims of the administrators. They may even need to request a campus wide ruling on how administrators handle faculty behavior and spell out specifics, and it should be standard in all departments.
And finally, delaying a decision on this situation puts a faculty member and her family in a precarious situation. If there is no job next semester, she should know that sooner rather than later. Applying for academic positions has a schedule, and long delays in handling this case causes a significant financial strain.
Overall it reeks of pettiness and mismanagement, and as a “personnel issue” they have “no comment.”
Bruce Byers Ph.D • Dec 15, 2015 at 4:35 pm
I do hope my initial comments get reviewed and posted. I think they are in keeping with the spirit of open, honest discussion. I’ve spent weeks supporting my colleagues at WSC, while they have been under duress. I’m not a student, but I have had to be involved.
Bruce E Byers • Dec 15, 2015 at 12:59 pm
As a former Associate to the Dean for Academic and Faculty Affairs at NYU for 5 years, I can claim, with authority, that the conduct of the inquiry into the actions of Professor Walker lacks the presence of an Academic Affairs officer that shows measured and unbiased inquiry. Claims this severe should have been available for careful review, detailed analysis, and proportional action. Even the initial claim of impropriety lacks merit. An seasoned protector of academic climate would never have let any incident turn into a public mess that, unless abandoned, will become a heritage WSC will carry for years. The VPAA would retrieve his credibility by simple public admission that initial claim lacked merit, and all reviews of Professor Walker are being dismissed. Letting the process proceed hides an obvious initial mistake. Deans make mistakes. Exceptional Deans do not proceed by building on them. If a review of Professor Walker proceeds, it will generate an ugly legacy that follows WSC for a decade. This will waste the Good WSC has achieved, and will be tied to his name for a long time. This is inconceivable for an Officer in this position to allow. His actions should be reviewed for sanctions, and his ability to lead after this, carefully reviewed. One wishes the Dean would see what is taking place. Unfortunate that she has not yet appeared to see her own critical role in halting a malfeasant action.