Trust Me, I’m a Doctor: Please don’t play the moron card
January 30, 2014
I can’t exactly say I was surprised to see Sarah Palin bring her petty, pin-headed, narrow-minded, narcissistic commentary to the day we celebrate the heroic efforts of MLK, Jr..
King bravely pushed against our endemic, centuries-long pattern of social, economic, and physical violence against African-Americans.
King orchestrated complicated non-violent protests with remarkable results in civil and political rights; he faced beatings, jailings and ultimately assassination in the pursuit of justice, dignity and equality.
Sarah Palin can see Russia from her front porch.
Palin could have spared us her idiocy and fatuous self-importance for just one day.
She could have issued a dignified statement from her posh lakefront compound, like, “All Americans should celebrate the vision of Reverend King that we all be color blind.” Nope.
Instead, after quoting a segment of King’s famous “I Have a Dream” speech, she bleated on Facebook: “President Obama: Stop playing the race card.”
I would dismiss this as the isolated rantings of the Alaskan She-Beast, but this refrain is all-to-common among leading conservative public figures.
They accuse Obama of somehow craftily using race to his advantage. Palin, along with Newt Gingrich and several Republican House members, also refer to Obama as the “Food Stamp President.” They go on to refer to food stamps as a form of “slavery.”
In other words, they demand Obama quit playing the “race card,” while in fact, they are drawing it from the deck themselves.
These politicians know what they are doing. When Palin calls out Obama for “playing the race card,” she is simply drawing attention to Obama’s race.
She is dipping into America’s deeply-sewn racism, the fact we all still see individuals through the lens of skin color.
It is to re-frame and stir up the prejudiced perceptions of southern and white male voters who are none-too-fond of Mr. Obama.
The same goes for labeling food stamps as a form of “slavery.” To frame this issue in racial terms reflects the tactics of national politicians dating back to George Wallace, Dick Nixon, and Ronald Reagan. They would craft rhetoric to conjure images and stir race-based feelings among lower class white voters. They stirred fears that hard-earned tax dollars were being siphoned away to lazy, indolent people of color living large on their welfare checks.
It was a means to cleave the lower classes and motivate working white households to support the Republicans whose policies did not naturally fit with lower class voters.
To interject “slavery” into the food stamp debate introduces a racial cue, and stirs emotions among lower-middle class whites, regarding an issue that is in fact NOT racially charged.
Southern politicians have long been adept at introducing such “code” words into campaign rhetoric. It’s tried, it’s effective and it persists.
It is all disgusting. To flippantly use “slavery” in political discourse does not respect the sordid, violent, race-based institution that plagued our country for 200 years and bears its scars today.
To tell Barack Obama to “quit using the race card” arrogantly ignores the fact that he has endured a life with all the perils and pitfalls of having darker skin, in a culture that denied opportunity and wealth, that hounded and arrested, that even murdered on the basis of skin color alone.
Martin Luther King Jr. Day is a day to rise above it. Sarah Palin swam in it.
Mark Leeper • Feb 18, 2014 at 12:07 pm
I appreciate the comments from both sides, thank you.
Chris • Feb 12, 2014 at 11:54 pm
I have a dream that one day students will know Martin Luther King Jr. as the man he actually was and not the watered-down-figure represented as a brave dreamer of racial equality for African-Americans.
It is a reduction of his greatness as a revolutionary activist with radical political views and an idealist social analysis. MLK’s legacy is too often focused on his fight for equal civil rights for African-Americans (not that it wasn’t a massive accomplishment). This is just a miniscule piece of his visionary brilliance and future brain-sparking visions. Dr. King championed everything Dr. Leeper has wrote in his opinion article and much more.
Maybe Palin is an evil genius (doubt it) or her superiors are masterfully puppeteering her to manipulate public consciousness and attention on Martin Luther King Jr. Day down to an argument of racial significance.
The most disrespectful part of Palin’s remarks was the timing in which the remarks shifted the focus of the media from familiarizing themselves with deeper discussion of what Dr. King stood for to a racial talking point. Only continuing the tendency for him being defined by one moment, or set of moments. A tactical racial comment that would bring the collective thought of MLK back to the “dreamer and fighter for African-American rights?”
The veil covering MLK continues to mask the ideals, visions, and the calls-to-action he presented.
These ideas are seemingly hidden from the MLK vernacular authority questioning quotes such as, “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death,” and “I could never again raise my voice against the violence of the oppressed in the ghettos without having first spoken clearly to the greatest purveyor of violence in the world today — my own government,” I don’t recall learning these things in any regular history class.
Perhaps his talk of revolution was too extreme for people to handle as he is quoted, “A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth.” You certainly don’t want to mess with the wealthy ability to make more money.
He goes on speaking of a true revolution, “[w]ith righteous indignation, it will look across the seas and see individual capitalists of the West investing huge sums of money in Asia, Africa, and South America, only to take the profits out with no concern for the social betterment of the countries, and say, “This is not just.” Are these ideas of revolution common ideas that come across the TV screen while the few remembrance commercials run on the Holiday?
Dr. King had economic views of society–once saying, “True compassion is more than throwing a coin to a beggar. It demands of our humanity that if we live in a society that produces beggars, we are morally commanded to restructure that society.” Dr. King cautiously expresses here that capitalism could not satisfy the needs of the poor–thoughts that were taboo then and continue to be today. He knew he was walking a thin line as is anyone questioning the ability of our economic system.
One of the final efforts by Dr. King which should be a legacy defining moment (generally overlooked) was an attempt to create and pass an economic and social bill of rights. This anti poverty program guaranteed and promised every U.S. citizen the right to education, a job, low-income housing etc. He truly envisioned a route to eradicate poverty by fixing its roots.
Furthermore, his moral code stood out when speaking of his fight against poverty, “America is at a crossroads of history, and it is critically important for us as a nation and a society to choose a new path and move upon it with resolution and courage…. Again he is reaching out for a revolution or massive change. He continues, “In this age of technological…and Political immorality, the poor are demanding that the basic needs of people be met as the first priority of our domestic program,” Dr. King was assassinated during his effort with the “Poor Peoples Campaign” (his economic bill of rights group) which put slow end to his final dream.
Focusing back to Sarah Palin’s morbid political strategies by playing the race card to try to discredit and end nutrition programs that are already being cut are quite shameful.
Hopefully, Dr. King’s crusades, visions and accomplishments will be taught in a less limited fashion in the future especially in high schools where the message is generally “tolerance and accepting everyone”. As far as college courses, there should be specific MLK classes with historical, political, and sociological approaches emphasized.
Finally Dr. King left us with a great quote, “[m]any people fear nothing more terribly than to take a position which stands out sharply and clearly from the prevailing opinion. The tendency of most is to adopt a view that is so ambiguous that it will include everything and so popular that it will include everybody.” So stand out sharply in your opinion, don’t let a great man’s legacy be watered down….(unless that’s your prevailing opinion)
Daniel • Feb 12, 2014 at 3:45 pm
Its always been my understanding that one of the duties of Poly Sci professors is to identify pin headed idiots who don’t have the best interests of the country at heart. Sarah Palin certainly falls under that heading. God knows, the woman doesn’t have a working brain. I hate to break the news to all of you, but America is still a very racist nation. I can reassure you that history will be kind to Barak Obama. The same cannot be said for Sarah Palin.
Sue • Feb 12, 2014 at 1:03 pm
And yet the same respect isn’t given to black conservatives like Justice Thomas and Dr. Carson who make the same point – though more eloquently than Palin- that racial divisions are being exacerbated by the left in order to coalesce, cement, and agitate specific demographic blocks of voters. It may be good politicking to create an “us vs. them” or “war on X” perception, but that doesn’t make it healthy for the public. This can be quantified in current polling on race relations, where perceived divides and distrust are worse than they were 5 years ago.
And while you have a right to your righteous indignation, you might want to take your own advice. You’ve never been a woman (that I know). You didn’t grow up with the general societal assumption that you were less intelligent than the other sex. Yet you so effortlessly toss out the words “pin-headed” and “idiocy” to label the woman that is the current target of your angst.
Linnea • Feb 8, 2014 at 4:27 am
Because the admin of this web site is working, no hesitation very
shortly it will be famous, due to its feature contents.
WayneMan • Feb 1, 2014 at 1:51 pm
Obama has used the race card multiple times. Instead of saying people don’t like him because of his policies, he tries to say people don’t like him because of his race. The fact that he brings it up is the exact opposite of what Dr. King envisioned! Instead of being judged by his character, Obama tries to say that he’s judged by the color of his skin. Conservatives criticized Clinton, and just about everyon criticized Bush. The fact that Obama is the president means that people will critical of him
It amazes me how many professors criticize and even mock conservatives. Dr Leeper has a total right to his opinion. But to call someone’s opinion petty, pin-headed, narrow-minded, and narcissist? It’s not just Dr. Leeper, it’s a large number of professors. I love Wayne State, but I wish we had more professors that had different views, or at least ones that were more respectful of people who have views and opinions other than their own. Dr. Leeper could have wrote this article with a much better and more respectful tone. Other professors aren’t much better.
TeaPartier • Feb 11, 2014 at 11:48 pm
Hear, hear…Thinking gives me such a headache. We need some professors to parrot our current worldview back to us. Then we can continue feeling good about ourselves!!!